In prepratation of having to call task_contributes_to_load() without holding rq->lock, we need to store the result until we do and can update the rq accounting accordingly. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand --- include/linux/sched.h | 1 + kernel/sched.c | 16 ++++------------ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/sched.h +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h @@ -1264,6 +1264,7 @@ struct task_struct { /* Revert to default priority/policy when forking */ unsigned sched_reset_on_fork:1; + unsigned sched_contributes_to_load:1; pid_t pid; pid_t tgid; Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c @@ -2467,18 +2467,7 @@ static int try_to_wake_up(struct task_st if (unlikely(task_running(rq, p))) goto out_activate; - /* - * In order to handle concurrent wakeups and release the rq->lock - * we put the task in TASK_WAKING state. - * - * First fix up the nr_uninterruptible count: - */ - if (task_contributes_to_load(p)) { - if (likely(cpu_online(orig_cpu))) - rq->nr_uninterruptible--; - else - this_rq()->nr_uninterruptible--; - } + p->sched_contributes_to_load = !!task_contributes_to_load(p); p->state = TASK_WAKING; if (p->sched_class->task_waking) { @@ -2503,6 +2492,9 @@ static int try_to_wake_up(struct task_st WARN_ON(task_cpu(p) != cpu); WARN_ON(p->state != TASK_WAKING); + if (p->sched_contributes_to_load) + rq->nr_uninterruptible--; + out_activate: #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ activate_task(rq, p, en_flags); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/