lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D9B5472.9080303@kernel.org>
Date:	Tue, 05 Apr 2011 10:42:10 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	rientjes@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] x86-32, NUMA: Reorganize calculate_numa_remap_page()

On 04/04/2011 03:23 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Separate the outer node walking loop and per-node logic from
> calculate_numa_remap_pages().  The outer loop is collapsed into
> initmem_init() and the per-node logic is moved into a new function -
> init_alloc_remap().
>
> The new function name is confusing with the existing
> init_remap_allocator() and the behavior is the function isn't very
> clean either at this point, but this is to prepare for further
> cleanups and it will become prettier.
>
> This function doesn't introduce any behavior change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo<tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Yinghai Lu<yinghai@...nel.org>
> Cc: David Rientjes<rientjes@...gle.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner<tglx@...utronix.de
> Cc: Ingo Molnar<mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin"<hpa@...or.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c |  127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>   1 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c
> index 60701a5..5039e9b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c
> @@ -264,70 +264,64 @@ void resume_map_numa_kva(pgd_t *pgd_base)
>   }
>   #endif
>
> -static __init unsigned long calculate_numa_remap_pages(void)
> +static __init unsigned long init_alloc_remap(int nid, unsigned long offset)
>   {
> -	int nid;
> -	unsigned long size, reserve_pages = 0;
> +	unsigned long size;
> +	u64 node_kva;
>
> -	for_each_online_node(nid) {
> -		u64 node_kva;
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * The acpi/srat node info can show hot-add memroy zones
> -		 * where memory could be added but not currently present.
> -		 */
> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "node %d pfn: [%lx - %lx]\n",
> -			nid, node_start_pfn[nid], node_end_pfn[nid]);
> -		if (node_start_pfn[nid]>  max_pfn)
> -			continue;
> -		if (!node_end_pfn[nid])
> -			continue;
> -		if (node_end_pfn[nid]>  max_pfn)
> -			node_end_pfn[nid] = max_pfn;
> -
> -		/* ensure the remap includes space for the pgdat. */
> -		size = node_remap_size[nid];
> -		size += ALIGN(sizeof(pg_data_t), PAGE_SIZE);
> -
> -		/* convert size to large (pmd size) pages, rounding up */
> -		size = (size + LARGE_PAGE_BYTES - 1) / LARGE_PAGE_BYTES;
> -		/* now the roundup is correct, convert to PAGE_SIZE pages */
> -		size = size * PTRS_PER_PTE;
> -
> -		node_kva = memblock_find_in_range(node_start_pfn[nid]<<  PAGE_SHIFT,
> -					((u64)node_end_pfn[nid])<<PAGE_SHIFT,
> -					((u64)size)<<PAGE_SHIFT,
> -					LARGE_PAGE_BYTES);
> -		if (node_kva == MEMBLOCK_ERROR)
> -			panic("Can not get kva ram\n");
> -
> -		node_remap_size[nid] = size;
> -		node_remap_offset[nid] = reserve_pages;
> -		reserve_pages += size;
> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "Reserving %ld pages of KVA for lmem_map of"
> -				  " node %d at %llx\n",
> -				size, nid, node_kva>>  PAGE_SHIFT);
> -
> -		/*
> -		 *  prevent kva address below max_low_pfn want it on system
> -		 *  with less memory later.
> -		 *  layout will be: KVA address , KVA RAM
> -		 *
> -		 *  we are supposed to only record the one less then max_low_pfn
> -		 *  but we could have some hole in high memory, and it will only
> -		 *  check page_is_ram(pfn)&&  !page_is_reserved_early(pfn) to decide
> -		 *  to use it as free.
> -		 *  So memblock_x86_reserve_range here, hope we don't run out of that array
> -		 */
> -		memblock_x86_reserve_range(node_kva,
> -					   node_kva + (((u64)size)<<PAGE_SHIFT),
> -					   "KVA RAM");
> -
> -		node_remap_start_pfn[nid] = node_kva>>  PAGE_SHIFT;
> -	}
> -	printk(KERN_INFO "Reserving total of %lx pages for numa KVA remap\n",
> -			reserve_pages);
> -	return reserve_pages;
> +	/*
> +	 * The acpi/srat node info can show hot-add memroy zones where
> +	 * memory could be added but not currently present.
> +	 */
> +	printk(KERN_DEBUG "node %d pfn: [%lx - %lx]\n",
> +	       nid, node_start_pfn[nid], node_end_pfn[nid]);
> +	if (node_start_pfn[nid]>  max_pfn)
> +		return 0;
> +	if (!node_end_pfn[nid])
> +		return 0;
> +	if (node_end_pfn[nid]>  max_pfn)
> +		node_end_pfn[nid] = max_pfn;
> +
> +	/* ensure the remap includes space for the pgdat. */
> +	size = node_remap_size[nid];
> +	size += ALIGN(sizeof(pg_data_t), PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> +	/* convert size to large (pmd size) pages, rounding up */
> +	size = (size + LARGE_PAGE_BYTES - 1) / LARGE_PAGE_BYTES;
> +	/* now the roundup is correct, convert to PAGE_SIZE pages */
> +	size = size * PTRS_PER_PTE;
> +
> +	node_kva = memblock_find_in_range(node_start_pfn[nid]<<  PAGE_SHIFT,
> +					  (u64)node_end_pfn[nid]<<  PAGE_SHIFT,
> +					  (u64)size<<  PAGE_SHIFT,
> +					  LARGE_PAGE_BYTES);
> +	if (node_kva == MEMBLOCK_ERROR)
> +		panic("Can not get kva ram\n");
> +
> +	node_remap_size[nid] = size;
> +	node_remap_offset[nid] = offset;
> +	printk(KERN_DEBUG "Reserving %ld pages of KVA for lmem_map of node %d at %llx\n",
> +	       size, nid, node_kva>>  PAGE_SHIFT);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 *  prevent kva address below max_low_pfn want it on system
> +	 *  with less memory later.
> +	 *  layout will be: KVA address , KVA RAM
> +	 *
> +	 *  we are supposed to only record the one less then
> +	 *  max_low_pfn but we could have some hole in high memory,
> +	 *  and it will only check page_is_ram(pfn)&&
> +	 *  !page_is_reserved_early(pfn) to decide to use it as free.
> +	 *  So memblock_x86_reserve_range here, hope we don't run out
> +	 *  of that array
> +	 */
> +	memblock_x86_reserve_range(node_kva,
> +				   node_kva + ((u64)size<<  PAGE_SHIFT),
> +				   "KVA RAM");
> +
> +	node_remap_start_pfn[nid] = node_kva>>  PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> +	return size;
>   }
>
>   static void init_remap_allocator(int nid)
> @@ -346,6 +340,7 @@ static void init_remap_allocator(int nid)
>
>   void __init initmem_init(void)
>   {
> +	unsigned long reserve_pages = 0;
>   	int nid;
>
>   	/*
> @@ -359,7 +354,11 @@ void __init initmem_init(void)
>   	get_memcfg_numa();
>   	numa_init_array();
>
> -	kva_pages = roundup(calculate_numa_remap_pages(), PTRS_PER_PTE);
> +	for_each_online_node(nid)
> +		reserve_pages += init_alloc_remap(nid, reserve_pages);
> +	kva_pages = roundup(reserve_pages, PTRS_PER_PTE);
> +	printk(KERN_INFO "Reserving total of %lx pages for numa KVA remap\n",
> +			reserve_pages);
>
>   	kva_start_pfn = memblock_find_in_range(min_low_pfn<<  PAGE_SHIFT,
>   				max_low_pfn<<  PAGE_SHIFT,

Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ