[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110405200153.GA17632@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 22:01:53 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Armin Schindler <armin@...ware.de>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/34] isdn/diva: Drop __TIME__ usage
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 06:07:05PM +0200, Armin Schindler wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 17:10 +0200, Armin Schindler wrote:
>>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Michal Marek wrote:
>>>> The kernel already prints its build timestamp during boot, no need to
>>>> repeat it in random drivers and produce different object files each
>>>> time.
>>>
>>> The module can be build separately from the kernel, therefore it can have
>>> an own build timestamp.
>> [...]
>>
>> If you want to distribute an out-of-tree version, that's your own
>> business. It shouldn't limit what is done with the in-tree version.
>> Perhaps we could make modpost add a build timestamp to OOT modules,
>> though.
>
> I know out-of-tree stuff doesn't matter here. But I'm thinking
> about just doing 'make modules'.
If we needs this somehow a generic solution is required.
Ad hoc solutions in some modules is not the way to go.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists