[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimz0fZnWdGqOF4c+o3Mp4GrmV2T0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 00:13:16 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@...il.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 2/4] ARM: Allow machines to override __delay()
2010/12/20 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>:
> Some machines want to implement their own __delay() routine based
> on fixed rate timers. Expose functionality to set the __delay()
> routine at runtime. This should allow two machines with different
> __delay() routines to happily co-exist within the same kernel
> with minimal overhead.
Can't you guys just put this into Russell's patch tracker now?
I think the issues raised have been adressed.
Unless this happens I will attempt to rebase it and put it in
the patch tracker myself soon-ish.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists