[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D9AB8B7.9020708@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 23:37:43 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"yinghai@...nel.org" <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
"lkml20101129@...ton.leun.net" <lkml20101129@...ton.leun.net>,
stable kernel team <stable@...nel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH urgent] x86: Save cr4 to mmu_cr4_features at boot time
On 04/04/2011 11:29 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> Peter very consciously did not mark the fix for this commit as -stable
>> material. It was ineligible for -stable for multiple reasons: it by no means
>> fixed a 2.6.39 regression and the fix was literally just a few days old.
>
> Has this issue been resolved in the mainline, BTW?
>
Just to refresh my memory... is this an issue in mainline, or is it only
a problem in the backport (I'm wondering if the trampoline unification
patches might have accidentally solved the issue)?
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists