[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110406094612.GA19943@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 11:46:12 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aarcange@...hat.com,
mtosatti@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, joro@...tes.org,
penberg@...helsinki.fi, asias.hejun@...il.com, gorcunov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool
* Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 11:33:33AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > So no, your kind of cynical, defeatist sentiment about code quality is by
> > no means true in my experience. Projects become ugly gooballs once
> > maintainers stop caring enough.
>
> In case of Qemu it was other way around. Maintainers started caring too late.
Nah, i do not think it's ever too late to care.
Example: arch/i386 - arch/x86_64/ was very messy for many, many years and we
turned it around and can be proud of arch/x86/ today - but i guess i'm somewhat
biased there ;-)
In my experience it's entirely possible to turn a messy gooball into something
you can be proud of - it's all reversible. Start small, with the core bits you
care about most - then extend those concepts to other areas of the code base,
gradually. There might be subsystems that will never turn around before
becoming obsolete - that's not a big problem.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists