[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110406171821.GB4987@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:18:21 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Akihiro Nagai <akihiro.nagai.hw@...achi.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
2nddept-manager@....hitachi.co.jp,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v3 3/6] perf branch trace: print pid and command
Em Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 04:55:23PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker escreveu:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 11:09:58AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Isn't there one in the 'tip/tmp.perf/trace' tmp branch? Lemme see...
> >
> > Yeah, and it is even yours ;-)
> >
> > commit 6a824e89c0dfe6bce3d7e85f987ec9c8e7304b34
> > Author: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> > Date: Fri Nov 12 05:35:06 2010 +0100
> >
> > perf, mm: Add fault tracing
> >
> > Part of that are two modified patches from Jiri Olsa who added the
> > fault tracepoints. I had to split them in two tracepoints so that we get
> > the faults handling duration.
> >
> > Originally-from: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> That forgets to mention it's based on Jiri Olsa's patch :)
>
> "tracing,mm - add kernel pagefault tracepoint for x86 & x86_64"
>
> (Message id <1289466549-7602-3-git-send-email-jolsa@...hat.com>).
>
> >
> > Can we dust this one off and get the ball rolling again?
>
> I prefer someone comes with a real need before me or Jiri respin
> that. There was perf trace but its development seems to be stale
> now.
Yeah, I need to resume work on it, sidetracked now tho.
> The page fault software event seem to be enough for basic
> dump requests. I don't like software events and prefer tracepoints
> in general but as long as the current implementation is enough
> and people don't need to measure page fault servicing time,
> write scripts or so, we are probably fine.
- ARnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists