[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110406234213.GC5806@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 05:16:24 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
SystemTap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"2nddept-manager@....hitachi.co.jp"
<2nddept-manager@....hitachi.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 22/26] 22: perf: rename target_module
to target
> >
> > -int show_available_funcs(const char *module, struct strfilter *_filter)
> > +int show_available_funcs(const char *elfobject, struct strfilter *_filter)
> > {
> > struct map *map;
> > int ret;
> > @@ -1990,9 +1990,9 @@ int show_available_funcs(const char *module, struct strfilter *_filter)
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> >
> > - map = kernel_get_module_map(module);
> > + map = kernel_get_module_map(elfobject);
> > if (!map) {
> > - pr_err("Failed to find %s map.\n", (module) ? : "kernel");
> > + pr_err("Failed to find %s map.\n", (elfobject) ? : "kernel");
>
> Hmm, these changes(module -> elfobject) are put back by the next patch.
> Could you check your patch stack?
>
In the next patch, we move "map =
kernel_get_module_map(module/elfobject)" to a new function
available_kernel_funcs(). For example: Even after the next patch,
show_available_funcs() still takes elfobject and not module. If you want
to avoid this, then we would have to either introduce the
available_kernel_funcs() in this patch Or we could merge this and the
next patch. Both those solutions dont look clean to me.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists