linux-kernel - Re: [RFT/PATCH v2 1/6] x86-64: Clean up vdso/kernel shared variables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110407080825.GF24879@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 10:08:25 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@....EDU>
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT/PATCH v2 1/6] x86-64: Clean up vdso/kernel shared variables


* Andy Lutomirski <luto@....EDU> wrote:

> Variables that are shared between the vdso and the kernel are
> currently a bit of a mess.  They are each defined with their own
> magic, they are accessed differently in the kernel, the vsyscall page,
> and the vdso, and one of them (vsyscall_clock) doesn't even really
> exist.
> 
> This changes them all to use a common mechanism.  All of them are
> delcared in vvar.h with a fixed address (validated by the linker
> script).  In the kernel (as before), they look like ordinary
> read-write variables.  In the vsyscall page and the vdso, they are
> accessed through a new macro VVAR, which gives read-only access.
> 
> The vdso is now loaded verbatim into memory without any fixups.  As a
> side bonus, access from the vdso is faster because a level of
> indirection is removed.

Ok, that's a pretty nice consolidation and speedup.

This layout:

> +DECLARE_VVAR(0, volatile unsigned long, jiffies)
> +DECLARE_VVAR(128, struct vsyscall_gtod_data, vsyscall_gtod_data)
> +DECLARE_VVAR(256, int, vgetcpu_mode)

Is spread out too much, using up several separate cachelines with nothing else 
on them. Why not pack it tightly, with natural alignment taken into 
consideration?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/