[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2DEEA3AB13739D45A22ADDB5086AEA0B01308475@sshaexmb1.amd.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 17:01:01 +0800
From: "Xu, Andiry" <Andiry.Xu@....com>
To: "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@....com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<stable@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] USB host: Fix lockdep warning in AMD PLL quirk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roedel, Joerg [mailto:Joerg.Roedel@....com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 3:51 PM
> To: Alan Stern
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman; Sarah Sharp; Xu, Andiry;
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; stable@...nel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB host: Fix lockdep warning in AMD PLL quirk
>
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 11:16:07AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>
> > The counter really should be a bool: Has the chipset already been
> > probed or not? After all, nobody cares how many times this routine
was
> > called.
> >
> > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&amd_lock, flags);
> >
> > This code now contains a bug: You incremented the probe_count
_before_
> > doing the probe. If another thread calls this routine right now, it
> > will get an incorrect result.
> >
> > Fixing this up should be fairly easy.
>
> Hmm, we can get rid of the amd_lock completly if every thread uses the
> following call-order:
>
> usb_amd_find_chipset_info();
> usb_amd_quirk_pll_enable();
> usb_amd_quirk_pll_disable();
> usb_amd_dev_put();
>
The correct order is:
usb_amd_find_chipset_info();
usb_amd_quirk_pll_disable();
usb_amd_quirk_pll_enable();
usb_amd_dev_put();
The pair of pll disable and enable may be called for multiple times.
Thanks,
Andiry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists