[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110407105850.GJ13963@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 12:58:50 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: oskar.andero@...yericsson.com, nicolas.pitre@...aro.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
eric.y.miao@...il.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Victor Boivie <victor.boivie@...yericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Allow for kernel command line concatenation
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 12:35:01PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 10:17 +0200, oskar.andero@...yericsson.com wrote:
> > +config CMDLINE_EXTEND
> > + bool "Extend bootloader kernel arguments"
> > + depends on CMDLINE != ""
> > + help
> > + The default kernel command string will be concatenated with the
> > + arguments provided by the boot loader.
>
> This suggests the parameters provided by the boot loader will override
> corresponding parameters of the default kernel command string. Is that
> correct (for all possible parameters)?
>
> Either way, shouldn't it be documented, perhaps in this help text, what
> will happen if a parameter of the default kernel command string and a
> parameter provided by the boot loader somehow conflict?
Then you will end up with both parameters I guess. What happens depends
on the parameter in question I guess. IMHO the description is fine.
But I wonder if the new mechanism is useful in the end.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists