linux-kernel - Re: [regression 2.6.39-rc2][bisected] "perf, x86: P4 PMU - Read proper MSR register to catch" and NMIs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D9DCD75.8060504@openvz.org>
Date:	Thu, 07 Apr 2011 18:43:01 +0400
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
To:	Shaun Ruffell <sruffell@...ium.com>
CC:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [regression 2.6.39-rc2][bisected] "perf, x86: P4 PMU - Read proper
 MSR register to catch" and NMIs

On 04/07/2011 06:38 PM, Shaun Ruffell wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 07:18:50AM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>> On Thursday, April 7, 2011, Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:30:36PM -0500, Shaun Ruffell wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I was able to bisect it down to commit 242214f9c1eeaae40, but I'm not
>>>> certain where to go from here.  Is this something that is already known
>>>> or is there more information I should try to collect?
>>>
>>> Nope, this is an ongoing issue.  What happened was the perf P4 nmi handler
>>> was swallowing all the NMIs.  My patch fixed that and exposed a double NMI
>>> problem.  We have been chasing it for a couple of months.  I think Cyril
>>> was finally able to duplicate it (as he wrote the P4 code).  I have
>>> confidence that he will find a fix for it soon. :-)
>>>
>>> Thanks for the report though!
>>
>> Hi, yeah, i got it too and i hope to fix this issue soon. Will ping as
>> only get working fix.
> 
> Don, Cyrill,
> 
> Thanks for the explanation and my apologies for not relating the
> previous discussions about this to what I was seeing. This issue would
> be a blocker for any 2.6.39 final right?

Well, could be, I didn't find the real reason for doubled nmi.
Still investigating. As a workaround you could simply disable
nmi-watchdog for a while in command line if it bothers you.

> 
> Cyrill, I would be more than happy to test any patches. It's relatively
> quick for me to reproduce.

OK, I'll prepare some patches for you to test. Still think on where it
could fails :( Stay tuned.

> 
> Thanks,
> Shaun

-- 
    Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/