linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] ARM: move SH-mobile runtime PM to arm/common for sharing with other platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 07 Apr 2011 10:08:41 -0700
From:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>
To:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...e.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] ARM: move SH-mobile runtime PM to arm/common for sharing with other platforms

Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org> writes:

> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:02:47PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> There is really nothing SH-mobile specific about this runtime PM
>> implementation.  Any platform wanting to implement runtime PM based on
>> simple clock gating can use this implementation.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>
>
> This observation is wholly architecture agnostic, so it's not clear that
> keeping it in arch/arm/common is any better. It seems that this would be
> better suited for drivers/base/power/ with a generic Kconfig symbol.

Sounds fine to me.

Thanks for the review,

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/