[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D9E3D7D.3090601@wildgooses.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 23:41:01 +0100
From: Ed W <lists@...dgooses.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: kernel@...dgooses.com, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
daniel@...aq.de, Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: New PCEngines Alix LED driver using gpio interface
On 07/04/2011 22:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 16:51:25 +0000
> kernel@...dgooses.com wrote:
>
>> From: Ed Wildgoose <kernel@...dgooses.com>
>>
>> This new driver replaces the old PCEngines Alix 2/3 LED driver with
>> a new driver that controls the LEDs through the leds-gpio driver.
>> The old driver accessed GPIOs directly, which created a conflict
>> and prevented also loading the cs5535-gio driver to read other
>> GPIOs on the Alix board. With this new driver, both are loaded
>> and therefore it's possible to access both the LEDs and onboard GPIOs
>>
>> This driver is based on leds-net5501.c
>> by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
>> Additionally it relies on parts of the patch: 7f131cf3ed
>> by: Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de> to perform detection of the Alix board
> As far as I can tell from looking at it, this driver maintains all the
> same interfaces and behaviour as the old version. Am I right?
>
Yes, this is correct. The substance of the change is simply to use the
leds-gpio interface rather than fiddling with gpio settings directly.
However, please note that Grant and Andres suggested that the driver
should instead move to "arch" and out of leds? Therefore, I created an
updated version of this patch which you can find from message id:
"1300553466-23873-1-git-send-email-kernel@...dgooses.com", ie:
http://lists.zerezo.com/linux-kernel/msg27455553.html
Additionally this updated patch has a slightly amended copyright -
several folks thought that the updated copyright statement was more
appropriate
My apologies that this updated patch was not more clearly marked as such
- Grant has taken the time to point out how I should submit patches more
clearly in the future
I would be happy to shuffle the code around further if anyone has an
opinion?
Thanks for picking this up
Ed W
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists