[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D9E6D19.1040809@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 21:04:09 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aarcange@...hat.com,
mtosatti@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, joro@...tes.org,
penberg@...helsinki.fi, asias.hejun@...il.com, gorcunov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool
On 04/06/2011 05:55 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Splitting up a project into several trees, often unnecessarily, is a
> self-inflicted wound really.
There's certainly something to this but the bit that surprises me is the
approaching being taken.
Why not take perf and all the other tools, stick them in their own git
repos, and use git submodules to track them in the main kernel source
tree. It seems like a nicer way to separate git histories while still
getting the benefits of a shared repository.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists