linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] bcmai: introduce AI driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 8 Apr 2011 19:14:09 +0200
From:	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
To:	Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
Cc:	"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	Michael Büsch <mb@...sch.de>,
	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
	George Kashperko <george@...u.edu.ua>,
	"b43-dev@...ts.infradead.org" <b43-dev@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linuxdriverproject <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] bcmai: introduce AI driver

2011/4/8 Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>:
> 2011/4/8 Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>:
>> Could you say something more about *class*, please? For my BCM43224 it
>> seems to be 0x0. WIll check BCM4313 in a moment.
>
> Same for BCM4313.
>
> BCM43224:
> axi: Core 0 found: ChipCommon (manuf 0x4BF, id 0x800, rev 0x22, class 0x0)
> axi: Core 1 found: IEEE 802.11 (manuf 0x4BF, id 0x812, rev 0x17, class 0x0)
> axi: Core 2 found: PCIe (manuf 0x4BF, id 0x820, rev 0x0F, class 0x0)
>
> BCM4313
> axi: Core 0 found: ChipCommon (manuf 0x4BF, id 0x800, rev 0x24, class 0x0)
> axi: Core 1 found: IEEE 802.11 (manuf 0x4BF, id 0x812, rev 0x18, class 0x0)
> axi: Core 2 found: PCIe (manuf 0x4BF, id 0x820, rev 0x11, class 0x0)

This is last one, really ;)

This is MMIO dump (from wl):
R 4 92.541328 1 0xfaafc000 0x4bf80001 0x0 0
R 4 92.541351 1 0xfaafc014 0x4bf81201 0x0 0
R 4 92.541373 1 0xfaafc028 0x4bf82001 0x0 0

So there is not any mistake in my reading code. This the youngest 0x1
is SCAN_ER_VALID.

-- 
Rafał
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/