[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1302284067-7860-3-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 19:34:24 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Prasad <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
"v2.6.33.." <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] x86, hw_breakpoints: Fix racy access to ptrace breakpoints
While the tracer accesses ptrace breakpoints, the child task may
concurrently exit due to a SIGKILL and thus release its breakpoints
at the same time. We can then dereference some freed pointers.
To fix this, hold a reference on the child breakpoints before
manipulating them.
Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Prasad <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Cc: v2.6.33.. <stable@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
index 45892dc..f65e5b5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -608,6 +608,9 @@ static int ptrace_write_dr7(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long data)
unsigned len, type;
struct perf_event *bp;
+ if (ptrace_get_breakpoints(tsk) < 0)
+ return -ESRCH;
+
data &= ~DR_CONTROL_RESERVED;
old_dr7 = ptrace_get_dr7(thread->ptrace_bps);
restore:
@@ -655,6 +658,9 @@ restore:
}
goto restore;
}
+
+ ptrace_put_breakpoints(tsk);
+
return ((orig_ret < 0) ? orig_ret : rc);
}
@@ -668,10 +674,17 @@ static unsigned long ptrace_get_debugreg(struct task_struct *tsk, int n)
if (n < HBP_NUM) {
struct perf_event *bp;
+
+ if (ptrace_get_breakpoints(tsk) < 0)
+ return -ESRCH;
+
bp = thread->ptrace_bps[n];
if (!bp)
- return 0;
- val = bp->hw.info.address;
+ val = 0;
+ else
+ val = bp->hw.info.address;
+
+ ptrace_put_breakpoints(tsk);
} else if (n == 6) {
val = thread->debugreg6;
} else if (n == 7) {
@@ -686,6 +699,10 @@ static int ptrace_set_breakpoint_addr(struct task_struct *tsk, int nr,
struct perf_event *bp;
struct thread_struct *t = &tsk->thread;
struct perf_event_attr attr;
+ int err = 0;
+
+ if (ptrace_get_breakpoints(tsk) < 0)
+ return -ESRCH;
if (!t->ptrace_bps[nr]) {
ptrace_breakpoint_init(&attr);
@@ -709,24 +726,23 @@ static int ptrace_set_breakpoint_addr(struct task_struct *tsk, int nr,
* writing for the user. And anyway this is the previous
* behaviour.
*/
- if (IS_ERR(bp))
- return PTR_ERR(bp);
+ if (IS_ERR(bp)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(bp);
+ goto put;
+ }
t->ptrace_bps[nr] = bp;
} else {
- int err;
-
bp = t->ptrace_bps[nr];
attr = bp->attr;
attr.bp_addr = addr;
err = modify_user_hw_breakpoint(bp, &attr);
- if (err)
- return err;
}
-
- return 0;
+put:
+ ptrace_put_breakpoints(tsk);
+ return err;
}
/*
--
1.7.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists