[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1302292554.1664.12.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 12:55:54 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
George Kashperko <george@...u.edu.ua>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
b43-dev@...ts.infradead.org,
Michael Büsch <mb@...sch.de>,
linuxdriverproject <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC][WAS:bcmai][PATCH V2] axi: add AXI bus driver
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 21:46 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> 2011/4/8 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>:
> > On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 21:45 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/axi/axi.h b/include/linux/axi/axi.h
> > []
> >> +#define axi_info pr_info
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_AXI_DEBUG
> >> +#define axi_debug pr_debug
> >> +#else
> >> +#define axi_debug do { } while (0)
> >> +#endif
> >> +#define axi_err pr_err
> >
> > I think redefining standard functionality like
> > this doesn't gain anything and loses some basic
> > grep capability.
>
> But on the other hand using:
> pr_info, pr_err, BUT axi_debug
> can easily lead to mistakes.
>
> Or is this possible to re-define pr_debug locally?
It is, but is that CONFIG_AXI_DEBUG actually
worthwhile?
If you think so, doesn't adding this to the Makefile
give you the same capability?
ccflags-$(CONFIG_CONFIG_AXI_DEBUG) := -DDEBUG
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists