| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:58:09 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws> To: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aarcange@...hat.com, mtosatti@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, joro@...tes.org, penberg@...helsinki.fi, asias.hejun@...il.com, gorcunov@...il.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool On 04/08/2011 10:59 AM, Scott Wood wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 21:14:06 -0500 > Anthony Liguori<anthony@...emonkey.ws> wrote: > >> If someone was going to seriously go about doing something like this, a >> better approach would be to start with QEMU and remove anything non-x86 >> and all of the UI/command line/management bits and start there. >> >> There's nothing more I'd like to see than a viable alternative to QEMU >> but ignoring any of the architectural mistakes in QEMU and repeating >> them in a new project isn't going to get there. > Supporting only a single architecture sounds like a significant > architectural mistake... only x86 deserves clean code? No, you just have to start somewhere. Since x86 is probably the ugliest, I think it's the best place to start. Regards, Anthony Liguori > -Scott > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists