[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D9F9301.5070204@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:58:09 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aarcange@...hat.com,
mtosatti@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, joro@...tes.org,
penberg@...helsinki.fi, asias.hejun@...il.com, gorcunov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool
On 04/08/2011 10:59 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 21:14:06 -0500
> Anthony Liguori<anthony@...emonkey.ws> wrote:
>
>> If someone was going to seriously go about doing something like this, a
>> better approach would be to start with QEMU and remove anything non-x86
>> and all of the UI/command line/management bits and start there.
>>
>> There's nothing more I'd like to see than a viable alternative to QEMU
>> but ignoring any of the architectural mistakes in QEMU and repeating
>> them in a new project isn't going to get there.
> Supporting only a single architecture sounds like a significant
> architectural mistake... only x86 deserves clean code?
No, you just have to start somewhere. Since x86 is probably the
ugliest, I think it's the best place to start.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> -Scott
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists