linux-kernel - Re: Subject: [PATCH] sched: fixed erroneous all

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1302347683.9086.1247.camel@twins>
Date:	Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:14:43 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>
Cc:	Vladimir Davydov <VDavydov@...allels.com>,
	"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH] sched: fixed erroneous all_pinned logic.

On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 12:20 -0700, Ken Chen wrote:
> sched: fixed erroneous all_pinned logic.
> 
> The scheduler load balancer has specific code to deal with cases of
> unbalanced system due to lots of unmovable tasks (for example because
> of hard CPU affinity). In those situation, it exclude the busiest CPU
> that has pinned tasks for load balance consideration such that it can
> perform second 2nd load balance pass on the rest of the system.  This
> all works as designed if there is only one cgroup in the system.
> 
> However, when we have multiple cgroups, this logic has false positive
> and triggers multiple load balance passes despite there are actually
> no pinned tasks at all.
> 
> The reason it has false positive is that the all pinned logic is deep
> in the lowest function of can_migrate_task() and is too low level.
> load_balance_fair() iterate each task group and calls balance_tasks()
> to migrate target load.  Along the way, balance_tasks() will also set
> a all_pinned variable.  Given that task-groups are iterated, this
> all_pinned variable is essentially the status of last group in the
> scanning process.  Task group can have number of reasons that no load
> being migrated, none due to cpu affinity.  However, this status bit
> is being propagated back up to the higher level load_balance(), which
> incorrectly think that no tasks were moved.  It kick off the all pinned
> logic and start multiple passes attempt to move load onto puller CPU.
> 
> Moved the all_pinned aggregation up at the iterator level. This ensures
> that the status is aggregated over all task-groups, not just last one
> in the list.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com> 

Thanks Ken!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/