lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 10 Apr 2011 13:28:17 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	buytenh@...tstofly.org
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove non-MAINTAINERS email address references for
 Lennert Buytenhek.

From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 22:27:16 +0200

> The problem is that half of them are out of date.  I at first sent a
> patch to change them all over to buytenh@...tstofly.org, but then got:
> 
> 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129858453409012&w=2
> 
> which seemed sensible. :-/

It's not just about maintainership, it's about copyright too.

For example, whether someone does or does not use their employer's
email address in the copyright can have an impact on whether their
employer can make a claim on copyright of the work.  There
are therefore real implications for what email address is there.

Like Andrew said, if people want to reach the active maintainer
they can use MAINTAINERS or look into the recent GIT logs for
the associated files.

Changing copyright email addresses can get into unrelated areas.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ