[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <op.vtrq0zac3l0zgt@mnazarewicz-glaptop>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:20:49 +0200
From: "Michal Nazarewicz" <mina86@...a86.com>
To: Michał Nazarewicz <mnazarewicz@...il.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, "Johannes Weiner" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] break out page allocation warning code
>> On Apr 8, 2011 10:23 PM, "Dave Hansen" <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> + if (fmt) {
>>> + printk(KERN_WARNING);
>>> + va_start(args, fmt);
>>> + r = vprintk(fmt, args);
>>> + va_end(args);
>>> + }
> On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 22:54 +0200, Michał Nazarewicz wrote:
>> Could we make the "printk(KERN_WARNING);" go away and require caller
>> to specify level?
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 23:02:02 +0200, Dave Hansen wrote:
> The core problem is this: I want two lines of output: one for the
> order/mode gunk, and one for the user-specified message.
>
> If we have the user pass in a string for the printk() level, we're stuck
> doing what I have here. If we have them _prepend_ it to the "fmt"
> string, then it's harder to figure out below. I guess we could fish in
> the string for it.
This is a bit unfortunate, but that's what I was worried anyway. I guess
creating a macro which automatically prepends format with KERN_WARNING
would solve the issue but that's probably not the most elegant solution.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +-----<email/xmpp: mnazarewicz@...gle.com>-----ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists