linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI: refactor io size calculation code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4DA31603.6070308@gaisler.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:53:55 +0200
From:	Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@...sler.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Kristoffer Glembo <kristoffer@...sler.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI: refactor io size calculation code

Linus Torvalds wrote:

>On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@...sler.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>In commit 13583b16592a ("PCI: refactor io size calculation code"):
>>    
>>
>>>refactor  code  that  calculates  the  io  size in pbus_size_io()
>>>and pbus_mem_io() into separate functions.
>>>
>>>Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@...xxxxxxx>
>>>---
>>>drivers/pci/setup-bus.c |   66
>>>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>>1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>>
>>>diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
>>>index 66cb8f4..2121215 100644
>>>--- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
>>>+++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
>>>@@ -404,6 +404,43 @@ static struct resource *find_free_bus_resource(struct
>>>pci_bus *bus, unsigned lon
>>>       return NULL;
>>>}
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>...
>>
>>    
>>
>>>+
>>>+static resource_size_t calculate_memsize(resource_size_t size,
>>>+               resource_size_t min_size,
>>>+               resource_size_t size1,
>>>+               resource_size_t old_size,
>>>+               resource_size_t align)
>>>+{
>>>+       if (size < min_size)
>>>+               size = min_size;
>>>+       if (old_size == 1 )
>>>+               old_size = 0;
>>>+       if (size < old_size)
>>>+               size = old_size;
>>>+       size = ALIGN(size + size1, align);
>>>+       return size;
>>>+}
>>>+
>>>/* Sizing the IO windows of the PCI-PCI bridge is trivial,
>>>  since these windows have 4K granularity and the IO ranges
>>>  of non-bridge PCI devices are limited to 256 bytes.
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>...
>>
>>    
>>
>>>@@ -516,14 +542,6 @@ static int pbus_size_mem(struct pci_bus *bus,
>>>unsigned long mask,
>>>                       mem64_mask &= r->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_64;
>>>               }
>>>       }
>>>-       if (size < min_size)
>>>-               size = min_size;
>>>-       old_size = resource_size(b_res);
>>>-       if (old_size == 1)
>>>-               old_size = 0;
>>>-       if (size < old_size)
>>>-               size = old_size;
>>>-
>>>       align = 0;
>>>       min_align = 0;
>>>       for (order = 0; order <= max_order; order++) {
>>>@@ -537,7 +555,7 @@ static int pbus_size_mem(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned
>>>long mask,
>>>                       min_align = align1 >> 1;
>>>               align += aligns[order];
>>>       }
>>>-       size = ALIGN(size, min_align);
>>>+       size = calculate_memsize(size, min_size, 0, resource_size(b_res),
>>>align);
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>On my SPARC32/LEON4 PCI system I get overlapped areas, double mapped
>>resources. Some BARs on PCIBUS0 are in the same non-prefetchable memory
>>range as the secondary bus PCIBUS1. Changing align to min_align in the above
>>call to calculate_memsize() fixes the problem, and the memory allocation is
>>the same as with 2.6.36.4 kernel.
>>
>>I belive this is just a typo.
>>    
>>
>
>It does seem that way. The original code used 'min_align' and 'align'
>itself is meaningless in that place.
>  
>
Agree.

>Can you confirm that the patch you talk about as fixing things is the attached?
>
>                  Linus
>  
>
Yes, the below patch works on the system that triggered the problem 
before. The last min_align was added in a later patch, I missed it 
initially.

Thanks,
Daniel

>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> drivers/pci/setup-bus.c |    4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
>index 89d0a6a88df7..ebf51ad1b714 100644
>--- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
>+++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
>@@ -676,10 +676,10 @@ static int pbus_size_mem(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned long mask,
> 			min_align = align1 >> 1;
> 		align += aligns[order];
> 	}
>-	size0 = calculate_memsize(size, min_size, 0, resource_size(b_res), align);
>+	size0 = calculate_memsize(size, min_size, 0, resource_size(b_res), min_align);
> 	size1 = !add_size ? size :
> 		calculate_memsize(size, min_size+add_size, 0,
>-				resource_size(b_res), align);
>+				resource_size(b_res), min_align);
> 	if (!size0 && !size1) {
> 		if (b_res->start || b_res->end)
> 			dev_info(&bus->self->dev, "disabling bridge window "
>  
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/