[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110411040544.GB21395@dastard>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:05:44 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: wanlong.gao@...il.com
Cc: broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
starvik@...s.com, jesper.nilsson@...s.com, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
ian@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, dp@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
lrg@...mlogic.co.uk, James.Bottomley@...e.de, aelder@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] xfs:removed the unused variable
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:10:29PM +0800, wanlong.gao@...il.com wrote:
> From: Wanlong Gao <wanlong.gao@...il.com>
>
> removed the unused variable "bdi" of xfs_buf.c .
>
> Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <wanlong.gao@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c | 2 --
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
> index 5ea4020..a125b32 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -657,8 +657,6 @@ xfs_buf_readahead(
> xfs_off_t ioff,
> size_t isize)
> {
> - struct backing_dev_info *bdi;
> -
> if (bdi_read_congested(target->bt_bdi))
> return;
<sigh>
Doesn't anyone look anymore to see if a problem has already been
reported before or fixed in the maintainers tree?
FYI, you're about the 5th person to send this same patch....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists