linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] Relax si_code check in rt_sigqueueinfo and rt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:56:25 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Julien Tinnes <jln@...gle.com>,
	Klaus Dittrich <kladit@...or.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Relax si_code check in rt_sigqueueinfo and
 rt_tgsigqueueinfo

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:26:55AM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> > Thanks, I think -stable needs this patch asap. It turns out 2.6.32.36, 2.6.33.9,
> > 2.6.37.6 and 2.6.38.2 pulled da48524eb20662618854bb3df2db01fc65f3070c.
> 
> Agree... the commit in Linus's tree is tagged for stable@.
> 
> The only issue I think is that Greg said he's not doing any more
> 2.6.37 releases?
> 
> Greg, this bug breaks the glibc test suite so maybe it's worth doing one more
> release?

Hm, I just checked the distros that I know of that are using the .37
kernel and they already have this patch in them, so it's not really
worth it to me to do another spin of the .37-stable tree.  Especially as
I'd like to have everyone move on to .38-stable instead.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/