[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110411202409.07b804e5@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 20:24:09 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] signals: Always place SIGCONT and SIGSTOP on
'shared_pending'
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 20:50:05 +0200
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> Sorry for delay again. I'll try to read the rest of this series
> tomorrow, I can no longer look at signal.c to today.
No problem.
> Oh, these changes do not look trivial. I must admit, I am a bit
> sceptical, but this is only my first impression based on amount on
> changes and more complex locking.
Yeah, the locking is more complex and I suspect that because I'm
dropping this patch the next iteration might become even more complex.
However, I definitely think the complexity is worth it because of how
much better signal delivery scales with these patches.
If you find anything that you think is overly complex I'm sure I could
clean it up with either comments or refactoring the code.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists