[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110411165035.5a303647.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:50:35 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<hughd@...gle.com>, <walken@...gle.com>, <aarcange@...hat.com>,
<riel@...hat.com>, <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Check we have the right vma in __access_remote_vm()
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 17:24:01 +1000 (EST)
Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au> wrote:
> In __access_remote_vm() we need to check that we have found the right
> vma, not the following vma, before we try to access it. Otherwise we
> might call the vma's access routine with an address which does not
> fall inside the vma.
>
hm, mysteries. Does this patch fix any known problem in any known
kernel, or was the problem discovered by inspection, or what?
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 9da8cab..ce999ca 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3678,7 +3678,7 @@ static int __access_remote_vm(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
> */
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_IOREMAP_PROT
> vma = find_vma(mm, addr);
> - if (!vma)
> + if (!vma || vma->vm_start > addr)
> break;
> if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->access)
> ret = vma->vm_ops->access(vma, addr, buf,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists