| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:33:26 +0800 From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com> To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>, Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] RCU: Add TASK_RCU_OFFSET On 04/11/2011 01:12 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:08:14AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: >> On 04/08/2011 01:13 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 09:26:16AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: >>>> On 04/08/2011 12:26 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 08:47:37AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 01:49:51PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: >>>>>>> On 04/07/2011 08:30 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 02:27:39PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 04/06/2011 02:06 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 13:13 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> And the following patch builds correctly for defconfig x86 builds, >>>>>>>>>>> while allowing rcupdate.h to see the sched.h definitions as needed >>>>>>>>>>> to inline rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock(). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Looks like an entirely reasonable patch to me ;-) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Quite... a lot better than the original proposal! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Glad you both like it! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When I do an allyesconfig build, I do get errors during the "CHECK" >>>>>>>> phase, when it is putting things into the usr/include in the build tree. >>>>>>>> I believe that this is because I am exposing different header files to >>>>>>>> the library-export scripts. The following patch silences some of them, >>>>>>>> but I am really out of my depth here. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sam, Jan, Michal, help? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanx, Paul >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Easy to split rcupdate.h, hard to resolve the dependence problem. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can apply the next additional patch when you test: >>>>>> >>>>>> I am sure that you are quite correct. ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> I am moving _rcu_read_lock() and _rcu_read_unlock() into >>>>>> include/linux/rcutree.h and include/linux/rcutiny.h, and I am sure that >>>>>> more pain will ensue. >>>>>> >>>>>> One thing I don't understand... How does is it helping to group the >>>>>> task_struct RCU-related fields into a structure? Is that generating >>>>>> better code on your platform due to smaller offsets or something? >>>> >>>> You don't like task_rcu_struct patch? I think it can make code clearer, >>>> and it can also check the code even when CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=n. >>>> >>>> For rcu_read_[un]lock(), it generates the same code, no better, no worse. >>>> >>>> It is just a cleanup patch, it is helpless for making rcu_read_[un]lock() inline, >>>> if you don't like it, I will give up it. >>> >>> I don't know that I feel strongly either way about it. It was necessary >>> with the integer-offset approach, but optional now. >>> >>>>>> Also, does your patchset address the CHECK warnings? >>>>> >>>>> I take it back... I applied the following patch on top of my earlier >>>>> one, and a defconfig x86 build completed without error. (Though I have >>>>> not tested the results of the build.) >>>>> >>>>> One possible difference -- I did this work on top of a recent Linus >>>>> git commit (b2a8b4b81966) rather than on top of my -rcu tree. Also, >>>>> I have not yet tried an allyesconfig build, which will no doubt locate >>>>> some more problems. >>>>> >>>>> Thanx, Paul >>>>> >>>> >>>> when defconfig or allyesconfig, CONFIG_PREEMPT=n and CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU=n >>>> when you make them "y": >>>> >>>> In file included from include/linux/rcupdate.h:764:0, >>>> from include/linux/tracepoint.h:19, >>>> from include/linux/module.h:18, >>>> from include/linux/crypto.h:21, >>>> from arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c:8: >>>> include/linux/rcutree.h:50:20: error: static declaration of ‘__rcu_read_lock’ follows non-static declaration >>>> include/linux/rcupdate.h:76:13: note: previous declaration of ‘__rcu_read_lock’ was here >>>> include/linux/rcutree.h:63:20: error: static declaration of ‘__rcu_read_unlock’ follows non-static declaration >>>> include/linux/rcupdate.h:77:13: note: previous declaration of ‘__rcu_read_unlock’ was here >>>> make[1]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1 >>>> make: *** [prepare0] Error 2 >>> >>> Yep. I need to move the rcu_read_lock() APIs to follow the inclusion >>> of rcutree.h and rcutiny.h. Also add include of sched.h to rcutiny.h. >>> The code movement does bloat the patch a bit. But rcu_assign_pointer() >>> must precede the inclusion of rcutree.h and rcutiny.h, so it is not >>> possible to simply move the inclusions. See below. >>> >>> Thanx, Paul >>> >> >> sched.h still contains rcupdate.h after applied this patch. > > Then we are not in sync -- sched.h does not include rcupdate.h in my tree. > It instead gets the struct rcu_head definition from include/linux/types.h. > See below for a consolidated patch. > > Thanx, Paul > >> See my [PATCH 2/4] for more info. >> >> >> # make lib/is_single_threaded.o >> CHK include/linux/version.h >> CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h >> CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh >> CC lib/is_single_threaded.o >> In file included from include/linux/rcupdate.h:639:0, >> from include/linux/rculist.h:10, >> from include/linux/sched.h:82, >> from lib/is_single_threaded.c:13: >> include/linux/rcutree.h: In function ‘__rcu_read_lock’: >> include/linux/rcutree.h:52:15: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type >> In file included from include/linux/rcupdate.h:639:0, >> from include/linux/rculist.h:10, >> from include/linux/sched.h:82, >> from lib/is_single_threaded.c:13: >> include/linux/rcutree.h: In function ‘__rcu_read_unlock’: >> include/linux/rcutree.h:68:5: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type >> include/linux/rcutree.h:70:7: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type >> include/linux/rcutree.h:71:46: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type >> include/linux/rcutree.h:71:78: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type >> include/linux/rcutree.h:71:6: warning: type defaults to ‘int’ in type name >> make[1]: *** [lib/is_single_threaded.o] Error 1 >> make: *** [lib/is_single_threaded.o] Error 2 > > drivers/scsi/scsi_sysctl.c | 1 + > fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 1 + > include/linux/kernel.h | 3 +++ > include/linux/pid.h | 2 +- > include/linux/rcupdate.h | 29 +++++++++-------------------- > include/linux/rcutiny.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/rcutree.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/sched.h | 10 ++++------ > include/linux/sem.h | 2 +- > include/linux/soundcard.h | 2 ++ > include/linux/sysctl.h | 5 +++-- > include/linux/types.h | 10 ++++++++++ > kernel/pid_namespace.c | 2 ++ > kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h | 38 ++------------------------------------ > kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 38 ++------------------------------------ > kernel/sysctl_binary.c | 1 + > kernel/sysctl_check.c | 1 + > net/core/sysctl_net_core.c | 1 + > net/dccp/sysctl.c | 1 + > net/ipv6/sysctl_net_ipv6.c | 1 + > net/irda/irsysctl.c | 1 + > net/phonet/sysctl.c | 1 + > net/rds/ib_sysctl.c | 1 + > net/rds/iw_sysctl.c | 1 + > net/rds/sysctl.c | 1 + > net/sctp/sysctl.c | 1 + > net/sunrpc/sysctl.c | 1 + > net/unix/sysctl_net_unix.c | 1 + > net/xfrm/xfrm_sysctl.c | 1 + > 29 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-) > sched.h still contains rcupdate.h after applied this patch. so it still fails. Is other part of patch(or patch 2/2) not sent? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists