lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimAvqT0MxPWvQH6ga698TYhCXF3CQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:51:41 +0300
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To:	Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Subject: Re: regression - slow git rebase performance with 2.6.39-rcX kernel

Hi,

[ Fixed your empty CC list. ]

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Zdenek Kabelac
<zdenek.kabelac@...il.com> wrote:
> I'm noticing quite slower speed of my git rebase commands on my git
> tree compared with 2.6.38 kernel.
> I've  T61 with SSD disc drive, ext4 fs, and by default deadline disk
> io scheduler
> The counter showing the number of 'rebased' patches on top of master
> is going much slower.
> When I boot 2.6.38 kernel it's much faster.
>
> Is it a known problem - or do I need to make a bisect ?

No, I don't think it's a known problem. Git bisect would be helpful, obviously.

                        Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ