lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1302575869.13492.1440076201@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Apr 2011 22:37:49 -0400
From:	"Adam McLaurin" <lkml@...tas.net>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Loopback and Nagle's algorithm

I understand that disabling Nagle's algorithm via TCP_NODELAY will
generally degrade throughput. However, in my scenario (150 byte
messages, sending as fast as possible), the actual throughput penalty
over the network is marginal (maybe 10% at most).

However, when I disable Nagle's algorithm when connecting over loopback,
the performance hit is *huge* - 10x reduction in throughput.

The question is, why is disabling Nagle's algorithm on loopback so much
worse w.r.t. throughput? Is there anything I can do to reduce the
incurred throughput penalty?

Thanks,
Adam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ