lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110412143559.186613198@clark.kroah.org>
Date:	Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:35:34 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>
Subject: [105/105] nfsd4: fix oops on lock failure

2.6.38-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>

commit 23fcf2ec93fb8573a653408316af599939ff9a8e upstream.

Lock stateid's can have access_bmap 0 if they were only partially
initialized (due to a failed lock request); handle that case in
free_generic_stateid.

------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:380!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
last sysfs file: /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/run
Modules linked in: nfs fscache md4 nls_utf8 cifs ip6table_filter ip6_tables ebtable_nat ebtables ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat nf_nat bridge stp llc nfsd lockd nfs_acl auth_rpcgss sunrpc ipv6 ppdev parport_pc parport pcnet32 mii pcspkr microcode i2c_piix4 BusLogic floppy [last unloaded: mperf]

Pid: 1468, comm: nfsd Not tainted 2.6.38+ #120 VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform
EIP: 0060:[<e24f180d>] EFLAGS: 00010297 CPU: 0
EIP is at nfs4_access_to_omode+0x1c/0x29 [nfsd]
EAX: ffffffff EBX: dd758120 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000004
ESI: dd758120 EDI: ddfe657c EBP: dd54dde0 ESP: dd54dde0
 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
Process nfsd (pid: 1468, ti=dd54c000 task=ddc92580 task.ti=dd54c000)
Stack:
 dd54ddf0 e24f19ca 00000000 ddfe6560 dd54de08 e24f1a5d dd758130 deee3a20
 ddfe6560 31270000 dd54df1c e24f52fd 0000000f dd758090 e2505dd0 0be304cf
 dbb51d68 0000000e ddfe657c ddcd8020 dd758130 dd758128 dd7580d8 dd54de68
Call Trace:
 [<e24f19ca>] free_generic_stateid+0x1c/0x3e [nfsd]
 [<e24f1a5d>] release_lockowner+0x71/0x8a [nfsd]
 [<e24f52fd>] nfsd4_lock+0x617/0x66c [nfsd]
 [<e24e57b6>] ? nfsd_setuser+0x199/0x1bb [nfsd]
 [<e24e056c>] ? nfsd_setuser_and_check_port+0x65/0x81 [nfsd]
 [<c07a0052>] ? _cond_resched+0x8/0x1c
 [<c04ca61f>] ? slab_pre_alloc_hook.clone.33+0x23/0x27
 [<c04cac01>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x1a/0xd2
 [<c04835a0>] ? __call_rcu+0xd7/0xdd
 [<e24e0dfb>] ? fh_verify+0x401/0x452 [nfsd]
 [<e24f0b61>] ? nfsd4_encode_operation+0x52/0x117 [nfsd]
 [<e24ea0d7>] ? nfsd4_putfh+0x33/0x3b [nfsd]
 [<e24f4ce6>] ? nfsd4_delegreturn+0xd4/0xd4 [nfsd]
 [<e24ea2c9>] nfsd4_proc_compound+0x1ea/0x33e [nfsd]
 [<e24de6ee>] nfsd_dispatch+0xd1/0x1a5 [nfsd]
 [<e1d6e1c7>] svc_process_common+0x282/0x46f [sunrpc]
 [<e1d6e578>] svc_process+0xdc/0xfa [sunrpc]
 [<e24de0fa>] nfsd+0xd6/0x115 [nfsd]
 [<e24de024>] ? nfsd_shutdown+0x24/0x24 [nfsd]
 [<c0454322>] kthread+0x62/0x67
 [<c04542c0>] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x114/0x114
 [<c07a6ebe>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10
Code: eb 05 b8 00 00 27 4f 8d 65 f4 5b 5e 5f 5d c3 83 e0 03 55 83 f8 02 89 e5 74 17 83 f8 03 74 05 48 75 09 eb 09 b8 02 00 00 00 eb 0b <0f> 0b 31 c0 eb 05 b8 01 00 00 00 5d c3 55 89 e5 57 56 89 d6 8d
EIP: [<e24f180d>] nfs4_access_to_omode+0x1c/0x29 [nfsd] SS:ESP 0068:dd54dde0
---[ end trace 2b0bf6c6557cb284 ]---

The trace route is:

 -> nfsd4_lock()
   -> if (lock->lk_is_new) {
     -> alloc_init_lock_stateid()

        3739: stp->st_access_bmap = 0;

   ->if (status && lock->lk_is_new && lock_sop)
     -> release_lockowner()
      -> free_generic_stateid()
       -> nfs4_access_bmap_to_omode()
          -> nfs4_access_to_omode()

        380: BUG();   *****

This problem was introduced by 0997b173609b9229ece28941c118a2a9b278796e.

Reported-by: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@...fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c |    9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -397,10 +397,13 @@ static void unhash_generic_stateid(struc
 
 static void free_generic_stateid(struct nfs4_stateid *stp)
 {
-	int oflag = nfs4_access_bmap_to_omode(stp);
+	int oflag;
 
-	nfs4_file_put_access(stp->st_file, oflag);
-	put_nfs4_file(stp->st_file);
+	if (stp->st_access_bmap) {
+		oflag = nfs4_access_bmap_to_omode(stp);
+		nfs4_file_put_access(stp->st_file, oflag);
+		put_nfs4_file(stp->st_file);
+	}
 	kmem_cache_free(stateid_slab, stp);
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ