lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1302625352.8321.2126.camel@nimitz>
Date:	Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:22:32 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
Cc:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] virtio balloon: kill tell-host-first logic

On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 11:13 +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> Sure, the only contention was on the commit message, where you stated
> modern qemus set this... qemu doesn't, and it should.  Care to do a
> patch for that? 

If Rusty hasn't pushed the commit out anywhere, we can still amend the
commit.  Otherwise, we're in a _bit_ of a pickle since you can't patch
git logs. :)

Whatever is easiest for Rusty works for me.  

How about this for a replacement log?

--

The virtio balloon driver has a VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_MUST_TELL_HOST
feature bit.  Whenever the bit is set, we must always tell the
host before we free pages back to the allocator.  Without this
feature, we might free a page (and have another user touch it)
while the hypervisor is unprepared for it.

But, if the bit is _not_ set, we are under no obligation to
reverse the order; we're under no obligation to do _anything_.
That's the state of affairs in current qemu:

	#define VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_MUST_TELL_HOST 0

This patch makes the "tell host first" logic the only case.  This
should make everybody happy, and reduce the amount of untested or
untestable code in the kernel.

This _also_ means that we don't have to preserve a pfn list
after the pages are freed, which should let us get rid of some
temporary storage (vb->pfns) eventually.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ