[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikoDELrA-RtA9BLm64mfoPgdADR0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:22:39 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Robert Święcki <robert@...ecki.net>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: Processes hang in an unkillable state
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Robert Święcki <robert@...ecki.net> wrote:
>>
>> Ok, applied Linus' patch and got the following (kdb dump in the attachment):
>>
>> It contains references to sys_mlock, but in another process/user that
>> oopsed (there are iknowthis and iknowthis2 processes running under
>> test and test2 users). I think I'll simply disable sys_madvise in the
>> fuzzer; and treat this oops as a separate issue.
This does seem to be something else.
It looks like some kind of live-lock situation between two processes
both doing madvise() and causing vmtruncate_range() calls.
Miklos wrote this patch for something bad in this area to serialize
concurrent unmap_mapping_range() calls in order to not restart forever
on vm_truncate_count. That got merged into 2.6.38, so it's there, but
I wonder if there is some case it misses.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists