[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110412162516.4120c441.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:25:16 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ben Blum <bblum@...rew.cmu.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
lizf@...fujitsu.com, matthltc@...ibm.com, menage@...gle.com,
oleg@...hat.com, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8.75 0/4] cgroups: implement moving a threadgroup's
threads atomically with cgroup.procs
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:44:20 -0400
Ben Blum <bblum@...rew.cmu.edu> wrote:
> Same as before; using flex_array in attach_proc (thanks Kame).
>
> -- Ben
>
> ---
> Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt | 39 ++-
> block/blk-cgroup.c | 18 -
> include/linux/cgroup.h | 10
> include/linux/init_task.h | 9
> include/linux/sched.h | 36 ++
> kernel/cgroup.c | 489 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> kernel/cgroup_freezer.c | 26 --
> kernel/cpuset.c | 96 +++----
> kernel/fork.c | 10
> kernel/sched.c | 38 --
> mm/memcontrol.c | 18 -
> security/device_cgroup.c | 3
> 12 files changed, 594 insertions(+), 198 deletions(-)
So where are we up to with all this.
I'm surprised that none of the patches had anyone's Acked-by: or
Reviewed-by:. Were they really that mean to you, or have you not been
tracking these?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists