[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110412073929.GA26892@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:39:29 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
kurup_avinash@...oo.com, maciej.rutecki@...il.com, rjw@...k.pl,
sedat.dilek@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, ioapic: move acpi_get_override_irq to acpi.c
* Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org> wrote:
> In order to get rid of the ugly CONFIG_ACPI ifdef, we move
> the function acpi_get_override_irq into acpi.c and add a new
> helper function ioapic_get_irq to io_apic.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> Cc: kurup_avinash@...oo.com
> Cc: maciej.rutecki@...il.com
> Cc: rjw@...k.pl
> Cc: sedat.dilek@...il.com
> LKML-Reference: <1301558489-4198-1-git-send-email-florian@...kler.org>
> ---
>
> Hi Ingo,
>
> Instead of exporting find_irq_entry, irq_trigger and irq_polarity, I added a
> new helper function 'ioapic_get_irq(..)' and exported that.
>
> Also I did it as a seperate commit, since it is more of a cleanup and the other
> commit is already tested... hope this is ok.
Yeah, looks good in principle.
Mind porting to the latest x86 devel tree and resend the patch? I tried to
apply your patch but there's a conflict. You can find the tree at:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists