linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] rfkill: Regulator consumer driver for rfkill

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:53:37 +0200
From:	Antonio Ospite <ospite@...denti.unina.it>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, openezx-devel@...ts.openezx.org,
	"John W . Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
	Guiming Zhuo <gmzhuo@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rfkill: Regulator consumer driver for rfkill

On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:41:28 +0200
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:

> > +	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "initialized\n");
> 
> Is that message really useful?
>

I can print the pdata->name here as well as an excuse to keep it,
reality is that I just like visual feedback in dmesg when a driver has
been loaded.

> Other than that, looks good to me.
> 
> johannes
>

In another message you said that the comment in rfkill-regulator.h
still seemed a little wrong to you, would you elaborate more about what
you were referring to?

Thanks,
   Antonio

-- 
Antonio Ospite
http://ao2.it

PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
   See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped