[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110413122751.GA21050@iram.es>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:27:51 +0200
From: Gabriel Paubert <paubert@...m.es>
To: Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Revert 737a3bb9416ce2a7c7a4170852473a4fcc9c67e8 ?
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 02:12:16PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mit, 2011-04-13 at 09:59 +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 07:29:22PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > On Die, 2011-04-12 at 14:00 +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 01:46:10PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > With no_wb=1 the driver goes a bit further but the X server ends
> > > > > > up in an infinite ioctl loop and the logs are:
> > > > >
> > > > > Which ioctl does it loop on? Please provide the Xorg.0.log file as well.
> > > >
> > > > From memory, the code was 0x64, which is DRM_RADEON_GEM_WAIT_IDLE.
> > >
> > > Note that it's normal for this ioctl to be called every time before the
> > > GPU accessible pixmap memory is accessed by the CPU. Unless the ioctl
> > > always returns an error, this may not indicate a problem on its own.
> >
> > It seems to be an infinite loop, always returning EINTR because
> > of regular SIGALRM delivery.
>
> That does sound like the GPU locks up. Do you get any messages in dmesg
> about lockups and attempts to reset the GPU at any time?
No.
Gabriel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists