lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:32:04 GMT
From:	tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	efault@....de, npiggin@...nel.dk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, frank.rowand@...sony.com, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/locking] mutex: Use p->on_cpu for the adaptive spin

Commit-ID:  c6eb3dda25892f1f974f5420f63e6721aab02f6f
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/c6eb3dda25892f1f974f5420f63e6721aab02f6f
Author:     Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
AuthorDate: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 17:23:41 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:52:33 +0200

mutex: Use p->on_cpu for the adaptive spin

Since we now have p->on_cpu unconditionally available, use it to
re-implement mutex_spin_on_owner.

Requested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110405152728.826338173@chello.nl
---
 include/linux/mutex.h |    2 +-
 include/linux/sched.h |    2 +-
 kernel/mutex-debug.c  |    2 +-
 kernel/mutex-debug.h  |    2 +-
 kernel/mutex.c        |    2 +-
 kernel/mutex.h        |    2 +-
 kernel/sched.c        |   83 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
 7 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mutex.h b/include/linux/mutex.h
index 94b48bd..c75471d 100644
--- a/include/linux/mutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/mutex.h
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ struct mutex {
 	spinlock_t		wait_lock;
 	struct list_head	wait_list;
 #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES) || defined(CONFIG_SMP)
-	struct thread_info	*owner;
+	struct task_struct	*owner;
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
 	const char 		*name;
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 3435837..1738504 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ extern signed long schedule_timeout_interruptible(signed long timeout);
 extern signed long schedule_timeout_killable(signed long timeout);
 extern signed long schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(signed long timeout);
 asmlinkage void schedule(void);
-extern int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct thread_info *owner);
+extern int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner);
 
 struct nsproxy;
 struct user_namespace;
diff --git a/kernel/mutex-debug.c b/kernel/mutex-debug.c
index ec815a9..73da83a 100644
--- a/kernel/mutex-debug.c
+++ b/kernel/mutex-debug.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ void debug_mutex_unlock(struct mutex *lock)
 		return;
 
 	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock);
-	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->owner != current_thread_info());
+	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->owner != current);
 	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!lock->wait_list.prev && !lock->wait_list.next);
 	mutex_clear_owner(lock);
 }
diff --git a/kernel/mutex-debug.h b/kernel/mutex-debug.h
index 57d527a..0799fd3 100644
--- a/kernel/mutex-debug.h
+++ b/kernel/mutex-debug.h
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ extern void debug_mutex_init(struct mutex *lock, const char *name,
 
 static inline void mutex_set_owner(struct mutex *lock)
 {
-	lock->owner = current_thread_info();
+	lock->owner = current;
 }
 
 static inline void mutex_clear_owner(struct mutex *lock)
diff --git a/kernel/mutex.c b/kernel/mutex.c
index c4195fa..fe4706c 100644
--- a/kernel/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/mutex.c
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
 	 */
 
 	for (;;) {
-		struct thread_info *owner;
+		struct task_struct *owner;
 
 		/*
 		 * If we own the BKL, then don't spin. The owner of
diff --git a/kernel/mutex.h b/kernel/mutex.h
index 67578ca..4115fbf 100644
--- a/kernel/mutex.h
+++ b/kernel/mutex.h
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 static inline void mutex_set_owner(struct mutex *lock)
 {
-	lock->owner = current_thread_info();
+	lock->owner = current;
 }
 
 static inline void mutex_clear_owner(struct mutex *lock)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index cd2593e..55cc503 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -4173,70 +4173,53 @@ need_resched:
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(schedule);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER
-/*
- * Look out! "owner" is an entirely speculative pointer
- * access and not reliable.
- */
-int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct thread_info *owner)
-{
-	unsigned int cpu;
-	struct rq *rq;
 
-	if (!sched_feat(OWNER_SPIN))
-		return 0;
+static inline bool owner_running(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
+{
+	bool ret = false;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
-	/*
-	 * Need to access the cpu field knowing that
-	 * DEBUG_PAGEALLOC could have unmapped it if
-	 * the mutex owner just released it and exited.
-	 */
-	if (probe_kernel_address(&owner->cpu, cpu))
-		return 0;
-#else
-	cpu = owner->cpu;
-#endif
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	if (lock->owner != owner)
+		goto fail;
 
 	/*
-	 * Even if the access succeeded (likely case),
-	 * the cpu field may no longer be valid.
+	 * Ensure we emit the owner->on_cpu, dereference _after_ checking
+	 * lock->owner still matches owner, if that fails, owner might
+	 * point to free()d memory, if it still matches, the rcu_read_lock()
+	 * ensures the memory stays valid.
 	 */
-	if (cpu >= nr_cpumask_bits)
-		return 0;
+	barrier();
 
-	/*
-	 * We need to validate that we can do a
-	 * get_cpu() and that we have the percpu area.
-	 */
-	if (!cpu_online(cpu))
-		return 0;
+	ret = owner->on_cpu;
+fail:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
-	rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+	return ret;
+}
 
-	for (;;) {
-		/*
-		 * Owner changed, break to re-assess state.
-		 */
-		if (lock->owner != owner) {
-			/*
-			 * If the lock has switched to a different owner,
-			 * we likely have heavy contention. Return 0 to quit
-			 * optimistic spinning and not contend further:
-			 */
-			if (lock->owner)
-				return 0;
-			break;
-		}
+/*
+ * Look out! "owner" is an entirely speculative pointer
+ * access and not reliable.
+ */
+int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
+{
+	if (!sched_feat(OWNER_SPIN))
+		return 0;
 
-		/*
-		 * Is that owner really running on that cpu?
-		 */
-		if (task_thread_info(rq->curr) != owner || need_resched())
+	while (owner_running(lock, owner)) {
+		if (need_resched())
 			return 0;
 
 		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * If the owner changed to another task there is likely
+	 * heavy contention, stop spinning.
+	 */
+	if (lock->owner)
+		return 0;
+
 	return 1;
 }
 #endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ