[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-893633817f5b58f5227365d74344e0170a718213@git.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:32:52 GMT
From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
efault@....de, npiggin@...nel.dk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, frank.rowand@...sony.com, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/locking] sched: Change the ttwu() success details
Commit-ID: 893633817f5b58f5227365d74344e0170a718213
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/893633817f5b58f5227365d74344e0170a718213
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
AuthorDate: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 17:23:42 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:52:34 +0200
sched: Change the ttwu() success details
try_to_wake_up() would only return a success when it would have to
place a task on a rq, change that to every time we change p->state to
TASK_RUNNING, because that's the real measure of wakeups.
This results in that success is always true for the tracepoints.
Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110405152728.866866929@chello.nl
---
kernel/sched.c | 16 +++++++---------
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 81ab58e..3919aa4 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2427,10 +2427,10 @@ static inline void ttwu_activate(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq,
wq_worker_waking_up(p, cpu_of(rq));
}
-static inline void ttwu_post_activation(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq,
- int wake_flags, bool success)
+static void
+ttwu_post_activation(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq, int wake_flags)
{
- trace_sched_wakeup(p, success);
+ trace_sched_wakeup(p, true);
check_preempt_curr(rq, p, wake_flags);
p->state = TASK_RUNNING;
@@ -2546,9 +2546,9 @@ out_activate:
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
ttwu_activate(p, rq, wake_flags & WF_SYNC, orig_cpu != cpu,
cpu == this_cpu, en_flags);
- success = 1;
out_running:
- ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, wake_flags, success);
+ ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, wake_flags);
+ success = 1;
out:
task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
put_cpu();
@@ -2567,7 +2567,6 @@ out:
static void try_to_wake_up_local(struct task_struct *p)
{
struct rq *rq = task_rq(p);
- bool success = false;
BUG_ON(rq != this_rq());
BUG_ON(p == current);
@@ -2582,9 +2581,8 @@ static void try_to_wake_up_local(struct task_struct *p)
schedstat_inc(rq, ttwu_local);
}
ttwu_activate(p, rq, false, false, true, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
- success = true;
}
- ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, 0, success);
+ ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, 0);
}
/**
@@ -2747,7 +2745,7 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long clone_flags)
rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
activate_task(rq, p, 0);
- trace_sched_wakeup_new(p, 1);
+ trace_sched_wakeup_new(p, true);
check_preempt_curr(rq, p, WF_FORK);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (p->sched_class->task_woken)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists