| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <tip-7608dec2ce2004c234339bef8c8074e5e601d0e9@git.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:34:40 GMT
From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
efault@....de, npiggin@...nel.dk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, frank.rowand@...sony.com, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/locking] sched: Drop the rq argument to sched_class::select_task_rq()
Commit-ID: 7608dec2ce2004c234339bef8c8074e5e601d0e9
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/7608dec2ce2004c234339bef8c8074e5e601d0e9
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
AuthorDate: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 17:23:46 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:52:36 +0200
sched: Drop the rq argument to sched_class::select_task_rq()
In preparation of calling select_task_rq() without rq->lock held, drop
the dependency on the rq argument.
Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110405152729.031077745@chello.nl
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 3 +--
kernel/sched.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
kernel/sched_fair.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched_idletask.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched_rt.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
kernel/sched_stoptask.c | 3 +--
6 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index b33a700..ff4e2f9 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1067,8 +1067,7 @@ struct sched_class {
void (*put_prev_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- int (*select_task_rq)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
- int sd_flag, int flags);
+ int (*select_task_rq)(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int flags);
void (*pre_schedule) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task);
void (*post_schedule) (struct rq *this_rq);
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index d398f2f..d4b815d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2195,13 +2195,15 @@ static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data);
* The task's runqueue lock must be held.
* Returns true if you have to wait for migration thread.
*/
-static bool migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
+static bool need_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p)
{
/*
* If the task is not on a runqueue (and not running), then
* the next wake-up will properly place the task.
*/
- return p->on_rq || task_running(rq, p);
+ bool running = p->on_rq || p->on_cpu;
+ smp_rmb(); /* finish_lock_switch() */
+ return running;
}
/*
@@ -2376,9 +2378,9 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
* The caller (fork, wakeup) owns p->pi_lock, ->cpus_allowed is stable.
*/
static inline
-int select_task_rq(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sd_flags, int wake_flags)
+int select_task_rq(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flags, int wake_flags)
{
- int cpu = p->sched_class->select_task_rq(rq, p, sd_flags, wake_flags);
+ int cpu = p->sched_class->select_task_rq(p, sd_flags, wake_flags);
/*
* In order not to call set_task_cpu() on a blocking task we need
@@ -2533,7 +2535,7 @@ static int try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state,
en_flags |= ENQUEUE_WAKING;
}
- cpu = select_task_rq(rq, p, SD_BALANCE_WAKE, wake_flags);
+ cpu = select_task_rq(p, SD_BALANCE_WAKE, wake_flags);
if (cpu != orig_cpu)
set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
__task_rq_unlock(rq);
@@ -2744,7 +2746,7 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long clone_flags)
* We set TASK_WAKING so that select_task_rq() can drop rq->lock
* without people poking at ->cpus_allowed.
*/
- cpu = select_task_rq(rq, p, SD_BALANCE_FORK, 0);
+ cpu = select_task_rq(p, SD_BALANCE_FORK, 0);
set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
p->state = TASK_RUNNING;
@@ -3474,7 +3476,7 @@ void sched_exec(void)
int dest_cpu;
rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
- dest_cpu = p->sched_class->select_task_rq(rq, p, SD_BALANCE_EXEC, 0);
+ dest_cpu = p->sched_class->select_task_rq(p, SD_BALANCE_EXEC, 0);
if (dest_cpu == smp_processor_id())
goto unlock;
@@ -3482,7 +3484,7 @@ void sched_exec(void)
* select_task_rq() can race against ->cpus_allowed
*/
if (cpumask_test_cpu(dest_cpu, &p->cpus_allowed) &&
- likely(cpu_active(dest_cpu)) && migrate_task(p, rq)) {
+ likely(cpu_active(dest_cpu)) && need_migrate_task(p)) {
struct migration_arg arg = { p, dest_cpu };
task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
@@ -5911,7 +5913,7 @@ int set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask)
goto out;
dest_cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpu_active_mask, new_mask);
- if (migrate_task(p, rq)) {
+ if (need_migrate_task(p)) {
struct migration_arg arg = { p, dest_cpu };
/* Need help from migration thread: drop lock and wait. */
__task_rq_unlock(rq);
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index 4ee50f0..96b2c95 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1657,7 +1657,7 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int target)
* preempt must be disabled.
*/
static int
-select_task_rq_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int wake_flags)
+select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int wake_flags)
{
struct sched_domain *tmp, *affine_sd = NULL, *sd = NULL;
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
diff --git a/kernel/sched_idletask.c b/kernel/sched_idletask.c
index a776a63..0a51882 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_idletask.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_idletask.c
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
static int
-select_task_rq_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int flags)
+select_task_rq_idle(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int flags)
{
return task_cpu(p); /* IDLE tasks as never migrated */
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
index 9ca4f5f..19ecb31 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -977,13 +977,23 @@ static void yield_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task);
static int
-select_task_rq_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int flags)
+select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int flags)
{
+ struct task_struct *curr;
+ struct rq *rq;
+ int cpu;
+
if (sd_flag != SD_BALANCE_WAKE)
return smp_processor_id();
+ cpu = task_cpu(p);
+ rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ curr = ACCESS_ONCE(rq->curr); /* unlocked access */
+
/*
- * If the current task is an RT task, then
+ * If the current task on @p's runqueue is an RT task, then
* try to see if we can wake this RT task up on another
* runqueue. Otherwise simply start this RT task
* on its current runqueue.
@@ -997,21 +1007,25 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int flags)
* lock?
*
* For equal prio tasks, we just let the scheduler sort it out.
+ *
+ * Otherwise, just let it ride on the affined RQ and the
+ * post-schedule router will push the preempted task away
+ *
+ * This test is optimistic, if we get it wrong the load-balancer
+ * will have to sort it out.
*/
- if (unlikely(rt_task(rq->curr)) &&
- (rq->curr->rt.nr_cpus_allowed < 2 ||
- rq->curr->prio < p->prio) &&
+ if (curr && unlikely(rt_task(curr)) &&
+ (curr->rt.nr_cpus_allowed < 2 ||
+ curr->prio < p->prio) &&
(p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1)) {
- int cpu = find_lowest_rq(p);
+ int target = find_lowest_rq(p);
- return (cpu == -1) ? task_cpu(p) : cpu;
+ if (target != -1)
+ cpu = target;
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
- /*
- * Otherwise, just let it ride on the affined RQ and the
- * post-schedule router will push the preempted task away
- */
- return task_cpu(p);
+ return cpu;
}
static void check_preempt_equal_prio(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
diff --git a/kernel/sched_stoptask.c b/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
index f607de4..6f43763 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
@@ -9,8 +9,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
static int
-select_task_rq_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
- int sd_flag, int flags)
+select_task_rq_stop(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int flags)
{
return task_cpu(p); /* stop tasks as never migrate */
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists