linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:02:50 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree

On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 13:14 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in kernel/sched.c
> between commit 6631e635c65d ("block: don't flush plugged IO on forced
> preemtion scheduling") from Linus' tree and commits 098247b90a9e ("sched:
> Provide p->on_rq") and a3380736e4b3 ("sched: Also serialize ttwu_local()
> with p->pi_lock") from the tip tree.
> 
> I fixed them up (hopefully - see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. 

It looks like Ingo accidentially published an older version of these
patches because I also got a UP build error from Tony yesterday.

A new series was merged this morning which should hopefully address both
problems.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/