[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimD9WB_RP1j8yJR7GUn_NuDuM2SHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:40:28 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...trum.cz>
Cc: Ian Kent <ikent@...hat.com>, Ric Wheeler <ricwheeler@...il.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Unionmount status?
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...trum.cz> wrote:
> I guess overlayfs includes the better part of unionmount and achieves
> similar level of functionality in much smaller code size and is
> actively developed.
>
> This might make it the best candidate for inclusion so far.
>
> It does not (yet?) support NFS which is one of the options commonly
> used with union solutions, though.
NFS is supported as a lower (read-only) layer, but not as an upper
(read-write) layer.
Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists