[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1302803039-9400-65-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:41:34 -0400
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To: stable@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: [34-longterm 064/209] latencytop: fix per task accumulator
From: Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>
=====================================================================
| This is a commit scheduled for the next v2.6.34 longterm release. |
| If you see a problem with using this for longterm, please comment.|
=====================================================================
commit 38715258aa2e8cd94bd4aafadc544e5104efd551 upstream.
Per task latencytop accumulator prematurely terminates due to erroneous
placement of latency_record_count. It should be incremented whenever a
new record is allocated instead of increment on every latencytop event.
Also fix search iterator to only search known record events instead of
blindly searching all pre-allocated space.
Signed-off-by: Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
---
kernel/latencytop.c | 17 ++++++++---------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/latencytop.c b/kernel/latencytop.c
index 877fb30..17110a4 100644
--- a/kernel/latencytop.c
+++ b/kernel/latencytop.c
@@ -194,14 +194,7 @@ __account_scheduler_latency(struct task_struct *tsk, int usecs, int inter)
account_global_scheduler_latency(tsk, &lat);
- /*
- * short term hack; if we're > 32 we stop; future we recycle:
- */
- tsk->latency_record_count++;
- if (tsk->latency_record_count >= LT_SAVECOUNT)
- goto out_unlock;
-
- for (i = 0; i < LT_SAVECOUNT; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < tsk->latency_record_count; i++) {
struct latency_record *mylat;
int same = 1;
@@ -227,8 +220,14 @@ __account_scheduler_latency(struct task_struct *tsk, int usecs, int inter)
}
}
+ /*
+ * short term hack; if we're > 32 we stop; future we recycle:
+ */
+ if (tsk->latency_record_count >= LT_SAVECOUNT)
+ goto out_unlock;
+
/* Allocated a new one: */
- i = tsk->latency_record_count;
+ i = tsk->latency_record_count++;
memcpy(&tsk->latency_record[i], &lat, sizeof(struct latency_record));
out_unlock:
--
1.7.4.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists