[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1302749677.3549.26.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:54:37 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>, "cl@...ux.com" <cl@...ux.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v3 2/3] percpu_counter: fix code for 32bit systems for
UP
Le jeudi 14 avril 2011 à 10:44 +0800, Shaohua Li a écrit :
> that's true. I just want the code looks consistent and this doesn't
> really obfuscate the code to me.
Doing so gives a false sense of security to user.
percpu_counter_init() is unsafe by nature.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists