linux-kernel - [34-longterm 171/209] Subject: [PATCH] ACPICA: Fix Scope() op in module level code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1302803767-9715-58-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:55:29 -0400
From:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To:	stable@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: [34-longterm 171/209] Subject: [PATCH] ACPICA: Fix Scope() op in module level code

From: Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>

  =====================================================================
  | This is a commit scheduled for the next v2.6.34 longterm release. |
  | If you see a problem with using this for longterm, please comment.|
  =====================================================================

commit 8df3fc981dc12d9fdcaef4100a2193b605024d7a upstream.

Some Panasonic Toughbooks create nodes in module level code.
Module level code is the executable AML code outside of control method,
for example, below AML code creates a node \_SB.PCI0.GFX0.DD02.CUBL

        If (\_OSI ("Windows 2006"))
        {
            Scope (\_SB.PCI0.GFX0.DD02)
            {
                Name (CUBL, Ones)
                ...
            }
        }

Scope() op does not actually create a new object, it refers to an
existing object(\_SB.PCI0.GFX0.DD02 in above example). However, for
Scope(), we want to indeed open a new scope, so the child nodes(CUBL in
above example) can be created correctly under it.

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19462

Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpica/dswexec.c |   19 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dswexec.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dswexec.c
index 6b76c48..30839ba 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dswexec.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dswexec.c
@@ -300,10 +300,25 @@ acpi_ds_exec_begin_op(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state,
 			 * we must enter this object into the namespace.  The created
 			 * object is temporary and will be deleted upon completion of
 			 * the execution of this method.
+			 *
+			 * Note 10/2010: Except for the Scope() op. This opcode does
+			 * not actually create a new object, it refers to an existing
+			 * object. However, for Scope(), we want to indeed open a
+			 * new scope.
 			 */
-			status = acpi_ds_load2_begin_op(walk_state, NULL);
+			if (op->common.aml_opcode != AML_SCOPE_OP) {
+				status =
+				    acpi_ds_load2_begin_op(walk_state, NULL);
+			} else {
+				status =
+				    acpi_ds_scope_stack_push(op->named.node,
+							     op->named.node->
+							     type, walk_state);
+				if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+					return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
+				}
+			}
 		}
-
 		break;
 
 	case AML_CLASS_EXECUTE:
-- 
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/