[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <C71658B6-2554-40D0-B8DA-8F1CB358E6FA@slimlogic.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:05:18 -0500
From: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@...mlogic.co.uk>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
lrg@...com, sameo@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] TPS65910: IRQ: Add interrupt controller
Hi Thomas,
On Apr 14, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Jorge Eduardo Candelaria wrote:
>> +static void tps65910_irq_lock(unsigned int irq)
>> +static void tps65910_irq_sync_unlock(unsigned int irq)
>> +static void tps65910_irq_enable(unsigned int irq)
>> +static void tps65910_irq_disable(unsigned int irq)
>> +
>> +static struct irq_chip tps65910_irq_chip = {
>> + .name = "tps65910",
>> + .irq_bus_lock = tps65910_irq_lock,
>> + .irq_bus_sync_unlock = tps65910_irq_sync_unlock,
>> + .irq_disable = tps65910_irq_disable,
>> + .irq_enable = tps65910_irq_enable,
>> +};
>
> Care to explain how that compiles?
I didn't notice it because there was no compilation error, however, I failed to
see the following warnings:
drivers/mfd/tps65910-irq.c:124: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
drivers/mfd/tps65910-irq.c:125: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
drivers/mfd/tps65910-irq.c:126: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
drivers/mfd/tps65910-irq.c:127: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
I'm changing this for v2.
Thanks,
Jorge
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists