[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DA756AC.6030201@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 00:18:52 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Shaun Ruffell <sruffell@...ium.com>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] perf, x86: fix unknown NMIs on a Pentium4 box
On 04/15/2011 12:05 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
...
>>
>> I don't think this patch will work. It would make sense if the unmasking
>> happened _after_ the "if (!handled)" path, but that is not the path Ingo
>> wanted for v1.
>
> This thing happened if inflight nmi reaches the system and note that inflight
> NMI comes from perf and masks lvt entry, it has nothing to do with "handled" but
> rather the _fact_ that NMI reached apic via LVTPC and as result -- masked it.
> Don, I might be missin something, brain is slowly going to sleep :)
>
Seems I'm wrong in this assumption, otherwise when this mechanism was
introduced for first time every in-flight nmi catched would block further
perf activity.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Don
>>
--
Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists