linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86-64, NUMA: fix fakenuma boot failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110414064414.GA15535@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:44:14 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
	Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@...el.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64, NUMA: fix fakenuma boot failure


* Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 04:02:43PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > Your patch have two mistake.
> > 
> >  1) link_thread_siblings() is for HT
> >     set_cpu_sibling_map() has another sibling calculations.
> >  2) numa_set_node() is not enough. scheduler is using node_to_cpumask_map[] too.
> 
> Thanks for seeing this through but your patch is badly whitespace broken.  
> Can you please check your mail setup and repost? [...]

Hm, the patch is whitespace clean and applies without fuzz here. Are you sure 
you processed it the right way?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/