[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikHKGLQvShJBL0P7XJ9XQ3EpgYxuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:34:18 +0200
From: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...trum.cz>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Ric Wheeler <ricwheeler@...il.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Ian Kent <ikent@...hat.com>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Unionmount status?
On 15 April 2011 14:29, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...trum.cz> wrote:
>> On 15 April 2011 13:31, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...trum.cz> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Cleaning up temporary files...
>>>> [ nn.nnnnnn] overlayfs: ERROR - failed to whiteout 'motd'
>>>> find: cannot delete `./motd': Operation not supported
>>>
>>> What is the upper filesystem type? Is xattr support enabled?
>>>
>>
>> The upper filesystem is tmpfs and there is not option regarding XATTR
>> in the config.
>
> Apparently tmpfs does not support generic xattr. I understand why
> tmpfs is an attractive choice for an upper filesystem, so this should
> be addressed.
>
> I see two options here:
>
> 1) implement generic xattr in tmpfs
IMHO this is a general feature that keeps overlayfs in itself clean
and small and can benefit other uses of tmpfs.
> 2) take whiteout/opaque support from union mounts and use that
How far from importing full unionmount is that?
Thanks
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists