[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1302872460.12428.27.camel@machina.109elm.lan>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:01:00 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: azurIt <azurit@...ox.sk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>,
Am?rico Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Regression from 2.6.36
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 13:36 +0200, azurIt wrote:
> sysfs was already mounted:
>
> # mount
> sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
>
>
> I have enabled all of the options you suggested and also CONFIG_DEBUG_FS ;) I will boot new kernel this night. Hope it won't degraded performance much..
>
It's only for curiousity's sake. As you report the patch fixes the
problem, it matches the theory that it's allocator latency. The script
would confirm it for sure, but it's not a high priority.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists